ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE
See how a property finding connects to its evidence and follow-up.
This fictional example shows the format and relationships among a finding, its evidence, stated limitations, and recommended follow-up. It is not a completed customer evaluation or a diagnosis of a real property.
From property to evidence.
| Record field | Illustrative entry |
|---|---|
| Property | Example Townhouse Community — fictional |
| Asset location | Building A → Roof drainage → Rear gutter |
| Observation | Visible debris and vegetation at a gutter section, recorded from ground level. |
| Evidence reference | PHOTO-EXAMPLE-001 — rear gutter, Building A. Demonstration reference only; no photo attached. |
| What remains unknown | Interior gutter condition, flow performance, and concealed damage were not verified. |
| Recommended follow-up | Arrange safe access for a qualified provider to inspect the affected section and establish the appropriate maintenance scope. |
| Condition / risk rating | Not assigned in this illustrative example. |
| Action owner / status | To be assigned by management / Open |
One finding, three useful views.
Property Knowledge Record
Keeps the observation and its location in the property’s overall record.
Findings Register
Tracks the follow-up, responsible person, status, and evidence supplied after work.
Stewardship Plan
Places the supported action into the broader maintenance and investigation priorities, when included.
Why the unknowns matter.
A photograph can show an observable condition without proving its cause, hidden extent, or full performance. The record keeps those limits visible and identifies when qualified follow-up may be needed.
Actual deliverables reflect the agreed scope, available evidence, and selected program.
Compare the baseline and ongoing support.
Compare the Property Baseline and Ongoing Stewardship programs to see how ASG scopes the work.
